Lev Grossman wrote a fascinating little article in last week’s Time magazine titled Who Dies in Harry Potter? God. As one who has only seen the Potter movies I’m mostly removed from the current hype surrounding tonight’s release of the final book in J.K. Rowling’s series.

Apparently one of the questions devoted readers are most interested in with this final book is whether Harry Potter will survive the story. This is where the Time article comes in. According to Grossman it’s not the potential death of Potter that is most intriguing about the seven-book series.
Rowling’s work is so familiar that we’ve forgotten how radical it really is. Look at her literary forebears. In The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien fused his ardent Catholicism with a deep, nostalgic love for the unspoiled English landscape. C.S. Lewis was a devout Anglican whose Chronicles of Narnia forms an extended argument for Christian faith. Now look at Rowling’s books. What’s missing? If you want to know who dies in Harry Potter, the answer is easy: God.
When the end comes, where will it leave Harry? He’ll face tougher choices than his fantasy ancestors did. Frodo was last seen skipping town with the elves. Lewis sent the Pevensie kids to the paradise of Aslan’s Land. It’s unlikely that such a comfortable retirement awaits Harry in the Deathly Hallows.
Now I wish I was reading the Potter series… I’m intrigued! I guess the films will suffice for now. I would be curious if any of the readers of this blog who have read the Potter books agree with Gossman’s analysis. Does God die in Rowling’s world? Is God irrelevant in a world of magic and sorcerers? Or, has Grossman missed something?
Any thoughts?

Leave a reply to Brian Cancel reply